I’m a Millennial, and my brain has been ruined by Twitter. Isn’t there a thread where I can read this stuff instead? Click here: TL;DR

I’m a Zoomer. Is there a shorter version for me? Click here: TL;stillDR

I.

Between 1893 and 1968, hundreds of thousands of young men and women joined the International Walther League, the official youth auxiliary of the Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod. At its peak, the league owned and operated several camps, a collection of youth hostels, a tuberculosis sanitarium, and a headquarters building in downtown Chicago. It also published six regular periodicals, supported foreign and domestic missionaries, provided financial support to the Lutheran Hour and to the synod’s Army and Navy Commission, ran multiple athletic leagues and choral societies, and provided invaluable volunteer labor and financial assistance to the thousands of LCMS congregations that sponsored a Walther League chapter, to say nothing of the countless Christian friendships and marriages that it fostered and encouraged.

Unfortunately, caught up in the societal changes of the 1960s, the league voted to abandon its traditional purpose and instead become a politically active, social justice-focused group. Its final convention was held at Purdue University in 1968, and it lost its affiliation with the LCMS in 1977. Since then, the LCMS has operated the Lutheran Youth Fellowship (LYF)/YouthLead for its high school students, while young Lutherans post-high school have had no dedicated national organization. It is for the sake of this latter group that, in the opinion of the author, it is time to bring the Walther League back.

II.

But first, why even consider this idea?

According to a 2017 LCMS Congregational Survey, only 31% of LCMS members remain in the LCMS between confirmation and adulthood. This statistic has held steady for three generations, with a similar one-in-three retention rate for Gen Xers and Baby Boomers (p. 26). Based on church attendance rates, it seems that young adults are most at risk of leaving the church immediately following their high school graduation.

Source: Relationships Count, p. 186

Unfortunately, today the LCMS doesn’t have a dedicated national youth organization for those who are post-high school. Opportunities and resources abound for high school students: LYF/YouthLead, the triennial National Youth Gathering, annual Higher Things conferences, various district gatherings and retreats, a youth ministry podcast, a website with a variety of youth resources, six dedicated national youth ministry staff members. . . . The list goes on. On the local level, many congregations also have active high school youth groups, many with part- or full-time DCEs, youth directors, or youth-focused associate pastors.

Post-high school, the picture is rather different. For college students, 250 campuses have an LCMS campus ministry, while military service personnel can take advantage of the LCMS chaplaincy program. For the vast number of young Lutherans not serving in the military or attending a college near an LCMSU chapter, there’s an inspirational two-minute video, a blog with no posts, a podcast that ended in 2020, a second podcast that apparently ended in 2014, some articles on campus ministries (two in the last year), a few scattered older articles (most about college), a Facebook page and Twitter account without much information, an LCMSU Twitter account that was last updated in 2020, and an LCMSU Facebook page that is updated but that doesn’t indicate a high degree of activity.

As far as I can tell, that short list is the sum total of resources directed to young adults in the LCMS at the synodical level.

The synod recognizes that the post-high school years are among the most dangerous for young Christians, yet it directs precious few resources toward men and women in that age group, especially for those who choose not to go to college (an increasing percentage of the population, especially among men).

Now, I say this not to denigrate the synod, but simply to point out the facts on the ground. In fact, the synod made an admirable attempt to develop young adult resources on the synodical level only a few years ago, as the defunct podcasts and social media accounts suggest.

From 2012 to 2021, the Rev. Marcus Zill was employed by the synod as a part- and then full-time coordinator/director of LCMS campus ministries. One of his great accomplishments was the organization of four national LCMS campus ministry conferences in 2013, 2015, 2017, and 2019. Several hundred youth attended each of these conferences, making them the largest gatherings of LCMS college students in 30 years. Unfortunately, the synod has many different mission programs but finite funds, and so after only 6½ years, Zill’s position was eliminated.

This points to one of the great strengths of the Walther League system: it began as a grassroots movement and was always financially and organizationally independent of the LCMS, which meant that it was unaffected by the vicissitudes of synodical funding priorities.

But enough background discussion! What concrete proposals am I making? Short answer: create a new national LCMS young adult association, taking as a starting point the practices of the old Walther League. I believe this would help address many of the shortcomings noted in recent research on young adult retention in the LCMS.

III.

In 2017, the LCMS organized two surveys on youth issues: the LCMS Congregational Survey and the LCMS Millennial Survey. Key results from these two surveys were published in 2019 in the book Relationships Count: Engaging & Retaining Millennials (available free on Kindle and Apple Books).

As the title suggests, these surveys were focused on the views of Millennials in the LCMS: what caused some to stay and some to leave, what viewpoint differences there were between those two groups, and what impact different congregational practices had on youth retention. Uniquely for surveys of this kind, the creators of the Millennial Survey sought responses from both current and former members of the LCMS, receiving responses from 1,579 young adults within the LCMS and 355 young adults who left the LCMS after confirmation (p. 60–61).

Despite the changes wrought by modern technology and the internet, the problems that young adults face today are not much different from the problems that young adults faced 70, 100, and 130 years ago. It is therefore unsurprising that many of the issues raised in Relationships Count were tackled by the Walther League in the 1950s, 1920s, and 1890s. The rest of this essay will look at individual issues raised in Relationships Count (plus a few other issues), show how the Walther League traditionally addressed each issue, and suggest ways that a renewed league could address the issue today.

IV.

Issue One! Bible Study.

Ryan C. MacPherson, in his article, Generational Generosity: Handing Down Our Faith to Our Children and Our Children’s Children, noted that some existing youth programs are less effective at retaining youth than they should be. One major problem is a lack of thorough, factual, historically-informed Bible studies. As MacPherson wrote,

youth need larger servings of theological meat, rather than psychological gravy; attempts to entertain the youth into the church do not succeed in the long run, but instead misshape them into people who crave entertainment for its own sake—which they will soon discover is available in richer variety outside the church.

President Matthew Harrison alluded to this as well, stating, “The key [to retention] is to build a strong Lutheran self-identity among the membership” (bolding original). How best to do this? Provide solid Lutheran Bible studies.

This concern is not new. A resolution at the synod’s 1923 convention included the following:

We recommend that sound helps be provided for work among our young Christians, especially for promoting Bible knowledge. . . . We call attention to the fact that in young people’s societies entertainment is easily overstressed while church history and church work are not sufficiently emphasized.

(1923 LCMS Convention Minutes, p. 51–52)

The Walther League was naturally aware of this problem, declaring that the church “needs first of all a program in which knowledge of the Bible and the principles of Christian faith and life are clearly and interestingly set forth” (Walther League Manual, 131). To assist in promoting deeper study of the Bible, the league published several model yearly Bible study programs, regular theological articles in the Walther League Messenger, Bible study helps in the Workers Quarterly (designed for the leaders of each society), a complete series of lessons in the quarterly Bible Student, and regular essays on faith and culture in The Cresset. As these were all directed toward those of young adult age, the league also published additional resources for teenagers, which I won’t discuss here.

A modern league could once again work to provide a variety of resources that promote solid Lutheran teaching and that would interest young adults, supplementing those resources that are provided by the synod, Higher Things, LHM, etc. Renewed efforts in that vein would presumably be posted directly to the internet, thus saving the expenses of printing and distribution. Such publications could also republish part of the vast trove of Walther League studies and resources where they are still found to be timely. All of this would help alleviate a very serious lack in the LCMS today.

As the authors of Relationships Count relate,

Those [Millennials] with views most closely aligned with what the LCMS teaches were nearly twice as likely to disagree than agree that they felt prepared to defend those views. These young people who hold firm to the teachings of the church likely expected to get more help from their church than they received. As a result, they have had to fend for themselves in defending the church’s theology. This may, yet again, suggest that LCMS churches are avoiding controversy, questions, and doubts that young people face from a culture that is not afraid to raise such issues.

(p. 221–22)

A new league for young people, led by young people, would not shy away from a full-throated defense and explanation of traditional Christian doctrine.

Issue Two! Leadership.

Today’s young adults “are ready for leadership roles. All phases of our research found a strong connection between young adult leadership in the church and young adult retention in the church. This . . . means giving young adults opportunities to lead within the church” (p. 39). Having young adult leaders in a congregation (specifically, younger than 32 years old) was directly correlated with youth and young adult retention (p. 50).

The Walther League traditionally provided such opportunities. All congregational chapters, districts, and the international organization were run by elected officers and committee chairs. Delegates were also elected for the annual international convention. Most young men and women in the LCMS cut their teeth on elections, parliamentary procedure, and the efficient running of a church through their involvement in the Walther League. A renewed league could teach these skills and provide these opportunities once again.

Issue Three! Moving.

“Americans Moving at Historically Low Rates, Census Bureau Reports”

So read the headline on a 2016 census bureau press release. Since then, the numbers have only continued to fall. And yet, even at the current lower rates, two in five young adults live more than ten miles from where they grew up, including one in five who live more than 100 miles away. Looking at older adults, nearly two in five live in a different state than the one where they grew up.

The LCMS Millennial Survey showed even greater mobility. “Of the Millennials we surveyed, nearly half live farther than a two-hour drive from where they grew up, and 40 percent live in a different state” (matching the CityLab data above). Less than a third lived near their hometown (p. 194).

Unfortunately, many thousands of young adults are lost to the church during such times of transition. Exactly how many are lost is impossible to say, as the LCMS congregations included in the 2017 survey had no idea where a full 30% of their confirmands from ten years prior were living (p. 26). For context, this is the same number as those who remained in the LCMS.

Source: Relationships Count, p. 26

This is by no means a new concern! The LCMS had the same issue a century ago, with backdoor losses far outstripping the gains from new converts. The Walther League played a vital role in stemming the loss, earning the commendation of the 1929 synod convention for its tireless work. The Walther League, through its 1200 hospice committees, worked hard to connect travelers and internal migrants to LCMS congregations in their new homes. Special attention was paid to students, with the league noting how important it was

to make the acquaintance of young Lutherans and of others of no church connection, who are attending colleges, universities, and other schools, or who are connected with some public institution. This is a very important duty for all societies situated near such schools and institutions. . . . We should do everything in our power to keep them in a live connection with their church during their student years. . . . It will mean much to all of these young people to have friends of their own faith with whom they may associate in their leisure hours. And just during these years when the foundation for their future career and for the future attitude towards life and its many problems is being laid, it is of the utmost importance that they be kept close to the church and hear the counsel and guidance which it offers.

(Walther League Messenger, Vol. 30, No. 6 (Jan. 1922), p. 226)

1930s Walther League traveler’s card

A new league would almost certainly want to take up this cause again. Regarding travel, its members would likely be well-served to make use of LutheranBnB, a Lutheran Airbnb alternative that currently sits at just over 200 listings. In cities with a large Lutheran population, local societies could eventually explore the possibility of purchasing new designated Lutheran youth hospices/hostels, if it was felt that that would be helpful (as before, these could be used by both temporary visitors and long-term residents). In the meantime, it would probably make sense to restart local hospitality/travelers committees in order to track and welcome those who move to a new location.

Issue Four! “Graduation.”

Youth and young adult retention is higher for those LCMS members who stay close to home after high school than it is for those who leave. But even for those who stay, the transition into young adulthood is not always easy.

The transitional bridge from high school youth ministry to active adult ministry within the same congregation can be more troublesome than one might think. . . . All too often, young adults, when reflecting on their transition from high school to college, share that they found that their church did not have a place for them in the church community after high school. Despite the church still offering Word and Sacraments, many young adults reported feeling as if they graduated from the church.

(p. 194)

The authors of Relationships Count recommend that congregations solve this issue by finding older adults who are willing to serve as mentors to these high school graduates. This is certainly a good solution if a congregation can manage it, but not all congregations will be able to successfully pull it off. 

The authors continue with another intriguing suggestion:

In some cases, a single congregation may not have enough graduates to provide a peer group, but relationships can be encouraged through cooperative young adult ministries with other area churches. Then, the home congregation can be a place where they worship and build relationships with members of the Body of Christ of all ages. Due to the ever-changing nature of this age group, this arrangement will need to be very flexible and nimble, but building a trusting relationship with other churches that can jointly invest in one another’s young people can pay long-term dividends for the Kingdom.

(p. 195)

This is basically a description of the Walther League. Having a group of older mentors is of course a good idea, but it is also extremely helpful for young people to have a group of peers to spend time with. Such a group can help span the sometimes-awkward gap and aid in the transition between high school and “adult” church membership. If a single congregation doesn’t have enough young adult members to create such a group on its own, cooperation should be the name of the game. This cooperative spirit, in turn, will likely lead naturally to a desire for cooperation at the state and national level.

Issue Five! Critical Mass.

In 2015, Kristina Lizardy-Hajbi, an analyst with the United Church of Christ, found that congregations with a “critical mass” of young adult members aged 18–34 were much more successful at retaining and bringing in new young adults. Such congregations were also much more likely to be theologically conservative, have a higher percentage of children and youth, and prioritize engagement with young adults.

Relationships Count noted the same issues. Many of the young members who completed their survey struggled to feel comfortable in their LCMS congregation because there was no one else their age. This lack of young adults was the third most common reason Millennials gave for leaving the LCMS (p. 268), while even those who stayed mentioned struggling with loneliness, isolation, and disconnection from the larger congregation due to a lack of peers (p. 279).

While almost all [active LCMS young adults] said that they would not exchange LCMS theology for young adult ministry, just as many said they struggled to find a support system of other people in their stage of life. . . . Many young adults in the survey stressed their need to belong to a group of believers their own age.

(p. 142)

Given this preference, it is unsurprising that congregations that make young adult ministry a top priority have many more young adult members.

Source: Relationships Count, p. 143

The congregations that are the most successful at youth and young adult retention do not just have a critical mass of young members, however. They have a larger number of members of all ages.

Source: Relationships Count, p. 91

It seems that success begets success. This is unfortunate news for the majority of LCMS congregations that have fewer than 300 members in church on an average Sunday. The good news is that cooperation between neighboring congregations might provide some of the benefits that larger congregations naturally enjoy. The connection with the Walther League should be self-evident. Current young adults would benefit just as much from a spirit of cooperation between churches as young adults did 50–130 years ago. Today, as many congregations have fewer young adult members, a transcongregational league would likely do wonders to reduce feelings of isolation and loneliness among young adults within the synod (at least as regards their relationship to their home congregation, though a close group of peers surely wouldn’t hurt in reducing loneliness and isolation in a general sense either!). 

Issue Six! The Church Catholic.

For this issue, I’ll just quote the book directly:

The young Lutherans who were the most likely to be retained as active Millennials were also very likely to attend an LCMS Youth Gathering or similar events. These larger events showed up in the data as heavily correlated with strong retention in the church. . . . When they were at these events, they had a chance to see that they are not alone. There were hundreds or thousands of other young people, just like them, who believe what they believe. At regional, national, and international events, such as the LCMS Youth Gathering, young people see the breadth of the Church. Young people benefit as they see their connectedness in the Body of Christ beyond their local congregation and high school years.

(p. 209–10)

Like everything else, this isn’t new. The Walther League Messenger included an article over a century ago, noting that

[Many youth], especially those from smaller congregations, think of their Lutheran Church only in terms of their own local congregations, and imagine it to be a weak and struggling church body. In consequence, they sometimes feel ashamed of the outward appearance that their church presents to others. . . 

Annual national Walther League conventions played a similar role to today’s National Youth Gatherings, providing members

with renewed enthusiasm and with gratitude toward God for having led them into the Lutheran church. . . . At home [they] will show new interest in matters pertaining to the congregation, the society, and the Kingdom of God in general. In short, they will become better Lutherans.

Walther League Messenger 28 (1920), 267–68, quoted in Alan Graebner, Uncertain Saints: The Laity in the Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod, 1900–1970 (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1975), 37–38.

The four successful Campus Ministry conferences show that this desire for national gatherings does not end at young members’ high school graduations. One of a new league’s first major projects should be to explore hosting new national gatherings, in whatever form they may take. 

Issue Seven! Marriage.

Just as they did in the 1920s (and due partly to similar causes), marriage rates are once again falling to historic lows. Unlike in the 1920s, however, this time the trend shows no sign of reversing.

Source

This would not be bad if, as in medieval Ireland, the decline was the result of devout Christians prayerfully following the admonition of St. Paul. But in fact, it is not. People shack up together, either via a series of one-night stands or via a habit of “serial monogamy.” Once they do pair up, many couples eschew marriage, preferring to simply move in together (and then often back out when one of them moves on). Others opt out of dating entirely, either from discouragement or because they find pornography a “safer,” if fleeting and ultimately unfulfilling, alternative. Still others hold off on marriage until they find The One, sadly setting themselves up for a state of depressing loneliness later in life.

When the broader culture is so broken in so many ways, it becomes increasingly difficult for faithful Christians to navigate the dating scene, even when they try to date within the church. But of course, in many LCMS congregations, things are even more complicated for young members, as there are so few active members their age. Is it any wonder that many Lutherans begin to date outside their home denomination?

Unfortunately, many of those LCMS members who do date and marry outside the LCMS ultimately end up joining their significant other’s church. “Eighty percent of Evangelical Protestants who have a significant other in their lives said that person is part of the same denomination” (p. 233). This of course means still more young members who leave the LCMS, even if they end up in another Christian denomination.

Ultimately, the church could probably do a better job encouraging marriage and teaching its young members how to increase their chances of getting married. An easy first step is just encouraging its young members to meet and spend time together. The Walther League did just that, producing so many marriages that it gained a reputation:

In those early years the League was often criticized by older folks because it fostered the cultivation of fellowship among our young people and more than once the League was referred to as a “matrimonial agency.”

(Fifty Years of Christian Service to Lutheran Youth: A Survey of the History of the International Walther League, 1893–1943 (Chicago: The Walther League, 1943), p. 17)

If you want LCMS Lutherans to stay LCMS Lutherans, it helps if they marry other LCMS Lutherans. If you want LCMS Lutherans to marry other LCMS Lutherans, it helps if there is an LCMS society where they can meet and get to know each other on an informal basis first. If you’re focusing specifically on young LCMS Lutherans as a start, well, that’s another reason for a new Walther League.

Issue Eight! Christian Service.

Ever since Millennials first came on the scene, social scientists have published study after study showing how interested they are in volunteerism. This is a trait they share with Boomers (and apparently Gen Xers too, but nobody knows or cares about them).

This trend shows up in the LCMS too, with members interested in serving both in their community and in their church (p. 286). Unfortunately, many youth don’t find such opportunities in their home congregations, which causes some of them to seek out pastures new and greener. “If the LCMS wants them back, it must give them places where they can serve” (p. 287).

In many congregations, this can quite frankly be difficult. Older members are often used to doing things a certain way, and they can sometimes drive off younger members who want to do things differently. In other cases, there simply aren’t many existing opportunities to serve. This, combined with a congregational aversion to change, can lead to a sort of stagnant situation that is unlikely to entice young members to stay.

But a young adult group can more easily get together and create its own opportunities. The Walther League traditionally did this, with outstanding results. In addition to the many corporate volunteer activities mentioned in Part I, local societies did yeoman’s work in their local congregations. I’ll give just a few examples from my own congregation. The congregation’s Walther League society

• installed the first telephone,
• paid to electrify the church,
• dug a basement fellowship area under the school,
• sponsored activities for the school children,
• landscaped the entire church property,
• held clothing drives for the needy,
• raised funds for charity and missions,

and so on. New groups would obviously want to help their own local congregations and schools as needed. As for other activities, the list of opportunities is endless, from LCMS-organized trips and disaster relief to local soup kitchens and food banks to Habitat for Humanity houses and ReStores to visiting shut-ins and nursing home residents, and so on.

Issue Nine! Christian Fellowship.

When putting together the results from the 2017 LCMS Congregational Survey and the LCMS Millennial Survey, the researchers kept finding that one factor had a stronger impact on youth and young adult retention than anything else: strong Christian bonds of fellowship. This factor stood out so much that they decided to title the book that published their findings, “Relationships Count.” In addition to statistical data, the book is peppered with quotes from current and former LCMS Millennials that hammer home this theme. To take just one example,

“There’s so much I love about the LCMS—it’s (sic) liturgy, it’s commitment to sound theology, it’s aversion to legalism. I would gladly be a part of an LCMS church if it had a robust community. . . . I’m forever thankful for my time [at] an LCMS church and school. It brought me to faith and provided me with a firm foundation.” —26-year-old, now a member of an Anglican church

(p. 288)

One thing that the Walther League did better than just about anything was fellowship. 

A few years ago, I was gifted the minute book of a local Walther League society from the early 1930s. In the span of two years, here is a noninclusive list of the activities they sponsored:

• Trips to state parks
• Bowling, softball, and basketball leagues (both girls’ and boys’ teams for the latter two)
• Halloween and Christmas parties
• Card nights
• Tennis tournaments
• Oratorical, poetry, and short story contests
• Wiener cookouts
• Weekly basketball nights and softball practices
• A Fall Festival
• A “travel tour”
• Skating parties
• Play performances
• Banquets for confirmands, parents, the junior society, etc.
• A pep session after a basketball tournament win
• Moonlight hikes

To say nothing of the regular biweekly gatherings of the club (and note that this was during the Great Depression, when many activities had to be canceled due to lack of funds).

I’m not even going to attempt to list all the fellowship activities that a new league could pursue. Options abound at the local, state, regional, and national levels. The important thing to my mind would be to just get things started at each one of those levels. After the initial start, things should grow and develop quite naturally.

V.

Since this essay isn’t already long enough, on to potential objections!

Objection One:

So far, you might be thinking, “A new Walther League sounds good in theory, but it would never work in practice.” The authors of Relationships Count, to the extent that they address the Walther League, seem to agree.

Much of past youth ministry programming in the LCMS has been event-based. For example, the Walther League of the first half of the twentieth century succeeded in bringing together teens and young adults weekly (or more often) at the church for Bible study and activity. Today’s children and teens are less and less likely to desire this kind of event-based ministry. . . . Youth ministry will need to move from centralized, regular meetings at the church to a more decentralized format, with opportunities for small-group connection. Instead of asking youth to sign up and commit to participation weeks or months in advance, texting students the day before or the day of smaller meet-ups may be far more effective. . . . Advanced planning and training are still necessary, but rigid structures and set events will no longer work on their own.

(p. 304)

I cannot deny that this is a real issue. I have been leading a high school youth group for the past seven years and assisting with a high school youth group off and on in the five years before that; in that time, I have noticed a definite shift in the youth. Five years ago, I would plan an event, and I could count on youth to sign up in advance, show up the day of, and communicate if they had any concerns or questions. Today, I can try to plan an event, but I get radio silence from the youth and their parents. On several occasions, I’ve planned an event, asked who wants to attend, canceled after no one responded, and only then heard from disappointed youth and their parents that they wanted to go. I know that many other youth directors in my area have experienced similar issues. If this trend is becoming universal, any sort of larger youth organization is doomed from the start.

However, young adults, being older and more mature, might be more willing to make plans further in advance. Also, if only a tiny minority of young adults in the LCMS do not follow this pattern, there should still be more than enough people to start a supracongregational organization. Speaking of numbers. . . . 

Objection Two:

“But the LCMS is shrinking! There simply aren’t enough young adults in the synod to sustain such an organization!”

The LCMS is indeed shrinking, and the numbers don’t look very good.

LCMS membership peaked in 1972 at 2,781,297 baptized members. Today, the LCMS has fewer than 1.8 million members, one million fewer than fifty years ago. The LCMS is also a rapidly aging denomination.

Source

In fact, the LCMS is one of the oldest denominations in the country.

Source

Internal figures show that Millennials made up only an estimated 15% of LCMS membership five years ago, despite making up 25% of the U.S. population. This certainly isn’t good, but it’s also far from catastrophic. Fifteen percent of LCMS membership is almost 300,000. In addition, “baptisms for Generation Z. . . are nearly in line with the percentage of the U.S. population they represent” (p. 15).

At its peak, Walther League membership typically ranged between 50,000 and 90,000 members, which included both the junior (high school aged) and senior (young adult) branches. It accomplished many of its more notable achievements when it had even fewer members. By 1915, for example, the league was already a force to be reckoned with, and yet it had fewer than 13,000 members (and this was after more than twenty years of growth). If only a small fraction of young LCMS members were interested in creating a new league, there would be ample numbers to create one.

Objection Three:

“You keep talking about the Walther League and about a new young adult organization in the same breath. But wasn’t the Walther League a high school-aged group?”

It is true that by the 1950s–’60s, when many of the surviving Walther League alumni were members, the league was largely a high school aged group. But that wasn’t always the case! For most of the Walther League’s early history, the majority of its members were 18 or older. In 1915, only ten percent of the Walther League’s 12,847 members were of high school age, with most of the rest in their twenties or thirties, plus some members who were considerably older. In most congregations, the under-18 crowd was largely neglected, and it was only after repeated admonitions on “the crying need of Junior sections,” as the 14–17-year-old groups were called, that the Walther League really took on the challenge of high school-aged work.

Objection Four:

“I’m concerned about the proposal to create something that is independent of the synod. That’s how the original Walther League was organized and look how it turned out.”

I expect that this is a distinctly minority view, so I won’t spend too much time addressing it. It is true that the original Walther League was independent and that it rather lost its way in the 1960s. But Concordia Seminary also lost its way during that time, and it was clearly under the control of the synod. More recently, many people have been expressing concerns about our synodical Concordia Universities, with some throwing their support behind the new independent Luther Classical College, despite (or perhaps because of) its independence from the corporate Missouri Synod. Higher Things is another good example—an independent Lutheran youth organization that complements the official synodical one. Lutheran Hour Ministries; the LWML; Issues, etc., . . . the list of independent LCMS-aligned institutions is vast and varied.

Objection Five:

“The synod’s recent research shows that major membership losses begin already before confirmation, not after it. Even among those who leave in young adulthood, their parents’ faith and (lack of) church involvement seem to be the biggest factor, not lack of young adult programs. Isn’t this all just a waste of time?”

The Missouri Synod, like most churches, is hemorrhaging members in all directions. The December 2016 special issue of the Journal of Lutheran Mission contained over 100 pages of data and discussion on the causes: births are down, leading to fewer baptisms; fewer than half of those baptized make it to confirmation; and, as discussed above, only one third of those confirmed remain in the church into adulthood. In addition, the number of adult deaths is rapidly closing the gap with the number of child baptisms. A new young adult organization will do little to nothing to solve a number of these problems.

However, any attempt to solve the synod’s many problems will require many solutions. A renewed young adult league would be one valuable part of the solution, even if it is not a complete solution in itself. 

Objection Six:

“Why talk about bringing back the Walther League? We should be looking forward, not looking back!”

This whiggish attitude—this view that new things are axiomatically better than old things—is one that has always annoyed me. It’s also an attitude that is puzzlingly common in an institution that is 2,000 years old and whose history goes back thousands of years further than that.

Fortunately, many respected authors have repudiated this view, including, notably, C. S. Lewis, who called it “chronological snobbery,” or

the uncritical acceptance of the intellectual climate common to our own age and the assumption that whatever has gone out of date is on that account discredited.

Perhaps more pertinently, Lewis also wrote,

We all want progress. But progress means getting nearer to the place you want to be and if you have taken a wrong turning, then to go forward does not get you any nearer. If you are on the wrong road, progress means doing an about-turn and walking back to the right road; and in that case, the man who turns back soonest is the most progressive man. We have all seen this when we do arithmetic. When I have started a sum the wrong way, the sooner I admit this and go back and start over again, the faster I shall get on. There is nothing progressive about being pigheaded and refusing to admit a mistake. And I think if you look at the present state of the world, it is pretty plain that humanity has been making some big mistakes. We are on the wrong road. And if that is so, we must go back. Going back is the quickest way on.

Now to apply this to the Walther League. . . .

Why look back?

First, because the Walther League was remarkably successful in its goal of retaining Lutheran youth. In 1924, Pastor E. Eckhardt, then statistician for the LCMS, penned a lengthy article bemoaning the loss of members incurred by the synod. Adult converts were becoming scarcer, the declining birth rate was leading to fewer baptisms, the number of new pastors was shrinking in relation to the size of the synod, and many members were defecting or moving away and losing their connection to the church. In many respects, this 98-year-old article is quite up-to-date!

The Walther League was sensible of these concerns and took active steps to counteract them. 

Secondly, why reinvent the wheel? It took the Walther League forty years of experimentation to develop a thorough, tested “comprehensive program.” Human nature is much the same today as it was a century ago. Why intentionally handicap yourself by ignoring the experiences of those who have trod this road before? Most people, when they make a major purchase or plan a major trip, will start by searching for reviews from people who just bought the same object or went on the same trip. Looking at best practices from the past is the same type of activity.

Finally, one of the major obstacles to a venture like this is a spirit of pessimism. People think, “that sounds great, but it’s impossible.” This then becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. Knowing with absolute certainty that not only is something possible, but that it has been done before, is an excellent antidote to this sort of defeatist thinking.

VI.

“Okay, you’ve convinced me. A new LCMS young adult organization sounds great. Now what?”

I accept that I am probably being optimistic in expecting that reaction from anyone. Nevertheless. . . where to go from here? A proper answer is long enough that it probably deserves its own post. The short answer is that there are any number of things you can do to help make a new young adult league into a reality.

First, you can spread the idea of a young adult league to other members of the LCMS. Young members will hopefully be interested in joining such a group, while older members, especially those old enough to have been part of the Walther League before its demise, may be willing to provide intellectual, moral, and possibly even financial support. Clergy may also be willing to boost the idea if you ask.

Second, you can try to organize a young adult group within your congregation. If there aren’t enough active young adults to make things work, you can see if there would be any interest in creating a group that spans several neighboring congregations. If even that won’t work, cast your net still wider. At one time, a number of cities—Buffalo, Cleveland, Fort Wayne, Indianapolis, Minneapolis-St. Paul, New York, Omaha, etc.—had unified city-wide young adult organizations (some within the Walther League and some without).

In the 1920s, the Fort Wayne league proudly boasted of its large membership.

Third, find others who are enthusiastic about and willing to work toward the creation of such a group. The creation of the original Walther League was delayed for more than a decade in part due to their means of communication. In the 1880s, the only efficient way to gather together young people’s societies from across the country was to contact individual pastors, trust that they would relay the information to the presidents of the local young people’s societies, trust that each president would relay the information to his members, then trust that the members would vote as a group to join people they had never met to create an unprecedented new organization. With so many points of failure, it is no wonder that the Walther League got off to a slow start.

Today, thanks to the internet, and especially to social media, individuals have the ability to contact each other directly without playing the elaborate game of telephone telegraph mentioned above. If none of the people you talked to personally have an interest in a young adult league, that’s fine. Try messaging people you met at a National Youth Gathering or Higher Things conference, or at an LCMS Campus Ministry conference or Y4Life conference. Find people on Reddit or TikTok or . . . I don’t know, this really isn’t my field. I presume you’ll figure it out.

Fourth, if you’re interested in learning more about what sorts of young adult activities were done in the past, feel free to drop by this site periodically to read new posts. I’m unfortunately fairly busy with real-world activities, and I really don’t enjoy writing very much, so I make no guarantees that I’ll post on any sort of regular schedule. Optimistically, I’d like to shoot for a post a week, as long as I can find the motivation to keep up with it. Speaking of which. . . .

VII.

Since this is the first post of a new blog, I suppose I ought to say something about it. I’m sure you’ve figured out the purpose of the blog by now. In case you haven’t, the blog exists to argue for the creation of a new LCMS young adult organization, in whatever form that may take. In aid of that cause, I will be discussing historical practices of the old Walther League and offering thoughts on how those practices (and others) could possibly be reintroduced today. Although I suppose this counts as a Lutheran blog, I don’t expect to talk too much theology here. Instead, I anticipate mostly talking about practical matters, though I’m not opposed to discussing theology if the subject comes up.

As for format, I will probably write in the style of blogs and forums that I enjoy reading: relatively long “effort posts” as top posts (though nothing near as long as this inaugural post), with shorter comments as needed. I may also copy old Vereinsbote/Walther League Messenger articles verbatim from time to time, as many of the articles are as valuable and timely today as they were when they were first written a century ago. As for the rest, I’m sure changes can be made as later needs dictate. If you have any suggestions for improvements, please let me know.